The external monitor talked about the plans to expand on the independent legal assistance program by expanding in-house legal expertise. I think that's what you were just speaking about.
What consideration has been given to survivors who would face a barrier to accessing these resources due to institutional betrayal, which makes them hesitant to access legal advice from an institution that has such a problematic history?
That would also link it back to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, considering that it would be a trusted ally and source, as opposed to internal resources.