Just to tidy up, one of the problems with defence procurement is sticker shock. I don't think we do a very good job of disaggregating sticker shock because, first of all, it's an issue with respect to the initial thought of what it might cost. I appreciate your declining to answer Mr. Stewart's question, because there was a prematurity to it. The second part is that when the PBO and the AG start to weigh in, they get into life-cycle costs, and what starts out as a $20-billion acquisition ends up as $60 billion by the time you figure all of it in.
Has any thought been given to alleviating sticker shock and the heart attacks that collectively go across the nation when we announce a procurement?