That's a great question. I think I might have only a partial answer to that.
In acquiring property, we have authorities. We can do some of that ourselves, but we also normally work with PSPC quite closely. The extent to which PSPC and Defence would be involved in explaining the potential use of those properties I think depends on what the potential use might be.
I can only assume that we do have processes in place to engage local stakeholders if there will be military activity there. We do that now in almost every context. Bases communicate regularly with local stakeholders around activities. When there are operations and training exercises, we communicate with Canadians. In the context of a purchase or an acquisition of land for the purposes of military installation or activities, I imagine we would be communicating.