First of all, I have to say that, at this time, we don't really know too much about what's left there. I'm using Churchill only as an example. That's the site I know the most. Still, we don't have much information. A lot of these things were poorly documented and even poorly studied. The first thing is that we need to identify what kind of contaminants are there. Is it qualified as a contaminated site, for example? Then we start to look into how to mitigate it. One good source we could use, in addition to scientific testing, is information from the community. Many folks are still there and know the operation.
The other part of mitigation is making sure that any new development will follow a very different model. You mentioned the Churchill Marine Observatory that I'm leading and the kind of research we're doing. We want to make sure that we learn the lessons from the past and engage community folks from the very beginning, so it's transparent and they are fully engaged in this process. We hope, as our study in Churchill is ongoing, and that kind of—