I'll give you an example.
The ILO document is a 620-page document. It has already done that for you. It links it by exposure and by what diagnoses they consider to be occupational diseases, or occupationally related to that. As I indicated earlier, you can't just blindly accept this, because, as I said, there is the attributable risk issue. It's estimated that 45% to 50% of all Canadians will develop cancer. Of course, we are all exposed to environmental hazards. How are we going to tease that out?
I think the issue needs to be that we provide care, look after the people who are sick, and stop arguing about causation. I know that will be unsatisfactory for some people. We need to start concentrating on care for people who are sick and not have them battle the bureaucracy over compensation and owning up to some responsibility. That is only wasting a lot of resources, which could be better spent on providing care to the patients who need it.