Along that same line, one of the questions I had for Veterans Affairs, Dr. Salisbury.... I didn't understand why they weren't ultimately doing that, seeing that there were these large issues of toxins and so on, and just attributing that presumptive diagnosis. There was also an explanation from them that the reason they didn't follow more of that American model under the PACT Act was that in the United States, veterans affairs has its own direct health administration.
I'm not sure if I buy that. I would love your opinion on that, considering whether the government decides it's going to treat this with all seriousness.
What would you have to say in that regard?