That's a great question. The battles of today are not the battles of 30 years ago. I would venture to say, or I would submit, that if the battles are different, then the people you require in order to meet that battle landscape have to be different as well.
You alluded to it yourself. They need to be technically proficient. Look at main battle tanks and some of our armoured vehicles. A lot of the young men and women who drive them are able to do that so proficiently because they have that great hand-eye coordination they're getting from gaming and other things. There are certain aspects we need of the recruits today that we didn't probably need many years ago.
I would just link that to something else, which is that the war fighter of today is obviously different from in the past, but the requirement for a war fighter has always been that it's someone who's respected and someone for whom there's no incongruency, in my humble opinion, between being a war fighter and being a respectful human being and treating everyone with respect and dignity. I think in today's climate, today's conflict climate, that's even more important because you lose information and data space when you lack trust, whether it's military or public servants, or it doesn't matter, because they feel more compelled to be able to share information and it's so much easier to share information today. It really behooves us in many ways to make sure that the people we do attract and we do retain have that sort of fundamental competency or characteristic about themselves as well.