There's certainly value in building that organization. I think that needs to be a medium-term goal. Most democratic countries have an organization like that—and Canada is a very large country with very few people and lots of challenges as a result of climate change, and other challenges—but I don't think it can be built in the short term.
There needs to be a dual approach: what we want the Canadian Armed Forces to do in the short term, and some response to this, and what the government needs to do in the medium term. When I say “medium term”, I mean prevention and investing much more aggressively in critical infrastructure and in coordination with NGOs, thinking of the forest fire centre, for instance. Those are very good models to follow, I think, rather than simply saying the Canadian Armed Forces shouldn't do this, because, yes, we can say they shouldn't do this, but somebody will still need to be able to respond when people are in dire straits.