It's interesting because most of the NGOs that we have experience with and that are part of our consortium have their everyday things that they would provide, everything from donations management to psychosocial support, food, hydration, all those kinds of things, but often they are also able to fill in the gaps.
Throughout my 15-plus-year career in disaster and emergency management, I've never responded to two things that were exactly the same and where the needs were exactly the same. It's also the advantage with an NGO consortium that often we will figure out if there is a gap, if there is something unique with this particular situation, and then which of those NGOs is best in a position to actually meet that need. It can be everything from those normal things to.... One of the recent examples with the humanitarian workforce was actually the Search and Rescue Volunteer Association of Canada, whose day-to-day operations are obviously doing search and rescue, but they were able to go into an indigenous community and do things like provide firewood, food, and those things into a remote community because they're very self-sufficient.
It really is a benefit of being able to provide additional expertise, because we're used to being able to fill in those gaps, and even if it's not something we do every day, we're able to ramp up very quickly.