I appreciate the question very much, because it speaks to what I always try to explain and what we should understand: a whole-of-society approach. At the moment, everybody thinks everybody should do something. It refers to a system in which each sector needs to enable the other sector to play a role.
When we talk about the private sector, it doesn't necessarily mean using its business capacity. It means the role the private sector has in terms of enabling volunteers to be ready and available when needed. It entails co-operation between the government and the private sector with respect to having those volunteers ready. It also speaks to who the private sector is: the people who live in the communities. We forget that.
A crucial point of why the civil protection model in Germany works so well is that the government has an ability to tap into the expertise of the private sector on a voluntary basis. Naturally, people are invited to bring their expertise to the all-hazards picture as unpaid experts. Everybody else—those just looking for an exciting hobby—can decide to train in that capability and become an expert, because the government offers the training needed, provides the equipment needed and ensures certifications are in line with the chamber of commerce, so that, as a volunteer, you also have a return of investment and can use your training with this government organization in your private life. There needs to be incentives for all sides.