Thank you very much.
I have another question for Professor Massie.
You said there were gaps, and that we need to look at funding to replace our submarines. As everyone knows, we don't have any nuclear submarines and our ice breakers don't really break ice. Some people even call them “slush breakers”. All of this makes us a bit more vulnerable during the colder months.
Last week, we heard representatives from the armed forces high command, and I asked them if we were more vulnerable in winter compared to other countries who have nuclear submarines, for example. I was told that given the increase in marine traffic and the worsening climate crisis, the important thing is not necessarily to have the same materiel, but to be able to detect the presence of others, by using satellites, for example.
Do you think that is the wrong message to send when we are trying to be cognizant of current risks?