One of the most interesting things we can do is probably go back and look at the latest agreement that was negotiated over search and rescue. This agreement dates to 2019. This gives a pretty realistic view of what countries think their capacities are in the region in some senses. This isn't a military agreement. It's basically meant to be related to just regular commerce and traversing in the region.
If you were to lay that agreement in those zones across various economic zones and look at how everything lines up, you're going to see that it's not exactly the same lines.
For example, Canada takes a slightly smaller slice in the search and rescue agreement than we say we have in terms of sovereignty. I think it speaks a bit to what we know we can do versus what we advertise that we might own. What's also interesting, for instance, is that the Norwegians take a larger slice in that agreement, in terms of areas where they would go and rescue, than what they would actually say is their piece.
There are opportunities there, but one thing we need to think about, for example, is accepting confidence-building measures if there's going to be Chinese and Russian traffic there. How can we create exercises on some of these things? They don't have to be militarized, but it's a level of understanding that we might have to work together here, so let's try to prevent a crisis.