Yes. In terms of infrastructure, it has to be telecommunications. It has to be energy. It also needs to be ports. It needs to be runways. Less and less so do we need roads these days. Communities are fly-in, fly-out.
Again, I think this goes back to how difficult it is to put one over another. You can't run 5G off windmills. We really need to have consistent, affordable energy. We also need to have consistent but state-of-the-art telecommunications. We also need that supporting physical infrastructure. We can't defend our north without any ports, or with just one or two ports. We do have a very large coastline.
As to where the most important emphasis should be put, this needs to be thought through strategically. This needs to be done in a manner that has a goal in mind. Let's say it's 2050. Where do we want to be in 2050? Then we figure out how to get there.
A lot of the energy we want to put into this is to be working with those who do smart cities. They're the ones who are talking about the infrastructure of tomorrow for the second half of the 21st century. We don't want to build a 1950s cement port if that's not what the future is.
We need to also understand where we're headed and where we're going. Then we can understand how to link these different pieces of infrastructure together. Ultimately, it's multi-purpose and multi-user, and this goes to defending—