Thank you for that. I appreciate the recommendation.
Of course, any action taken by any government has certain side effects and a ripple effect on future governments as well, because when something isn't done, or when spending stops at a certain point, certain catch-up needs to be done.
Do you think it would be accurate to say that some of the gaps—and where we are currently—could also be partly due to some of the backlog left behind? For example, in the early 2010s, there were some serious cutbacks on defence spending. Do you think that, possibly, some of the reasons why we are where we are today could be because of how we've chosen to spend over the last decade?