I think our audit did demonstrate—and you've probably heard it from many other witnesses—that there are so many parties involved in the Arctic that siloing it probably doesn't make sense. It's about doing it together and leveraging the expertise and the knowledge of all involved. That would be the approach that I would encourage, but again, it's not based on a lot of the evidence. I think having diverse use is always the best way to go about tackling an issue.
Here it's more about knowing the gaps and not having the plan to deal with the gaps, so having the plan is really the best place to start.