There is traditional cybersecurity, which is usually unauthorized access to systems and data. What you're talking about—and I really liked the question—goes a bit deeper, to societal resilience. We're talking about people and people's views of the world.
When we think about disinformation, misinformation or malinformation, the point is that people are persuadable. There are sophisticated influence campaigns that are taking place all the time to try to change our discourse, to sow societal division and to pull people in different directions, when we need to be uniting. The point here is that many of those capabilities are commercial and off-the-shelf. The highest profile example was the 2016 election in the United States, when the Russians got involved.
The point here is that the system didn't malfunction. It functioned as it was built. What we have is social intermediation with platforms sitting at the middle of our social discourse, and their incentive is profit. Their incentive is eyeballs. That's what we've built for ourselves.
It's a bigger conversation than just the cybersecurity stuff, but it's a great question.