When you're talking about resources, I assume you mean both services and products. The challenge right now is that much of the.... Certainly within the agencies, the resources are within the agencies and the products typically have been developed within the agencies, so there isn't a lot of bleed-over between where the capability gaps exist and the exposure of those capability gaps to the industry, because it's not in the nature of CSE to expose where it has capability gaps. That is one of the number one issues, which is that we don't know what we don't know. They do not know what we have, and we do not know where their capability gaps exist.
However, what I can say is that the industry itself, about 60% of the industry, has capability in securing networks and data infrastructure, which generally means that we look after mission assurance. Mission assurance can be for networks in threat environments, and it can also be for sensors and assets like planes, ships and tanks that operate in networked environments, as in the Canadian Armed Forces, as well as the infrastructure—like the cloud, for example—that the Canadian Armed Forces itself uses for its enterprise.
We're also very strong in niche areas like encryption, penetration testing and threat monitoring, and the space assets that we maintain, operate and deploy, such as RADARSAT-2, are used for intelligence collection and targeting.
I can tell you what we have; I just can't tell you where the capability gaps exist within the agencies.