There are a couple of things. One is securing the supply chain, which means, on one hand, adopting regulatory standards as they become available. We are concerned. Fifty per cent of the defence industrial base exports, half of those exports, go to the United States. If we want to be a trusted partner in an American supply chain, we will need to be moving in lockstep with them to ensure that we can be trusted partners and that they will be able to procure from us. That's number one. That's a pressing economic consideration for us as a country.
The second thing is just the sharing of information on threats. You would have seen in the papers recently that there have been breaches through the private sector, through critical infrastructure providers or through the defence industrial base. We need to ensure that there is tighter connectivity and sharing of those breaches in a proactive disclosure manner, so that we can leverage the technologies and agencies in order to get the best protections. It's that quid pro quo and it needs to be done in an institutionalized way. It can't be done every time an incursion occurs. There has to be a system that's already in place so we can draw back on it if and when, potentially, cyber-attacks escalate, which we have seen happening in the theatre of war in Ukraine right now.