Yes, a light one.
Just for historical accuracy, let me say that Ukraine had a position of non-alignment—not exactly neutrality—from 1991 to 2014. It was balancing off between the Russians and the west, but as of 2014 it really shifted, joining NATO and the EU firmly into its constitution.
The question is—and this is why there's war, from the Russian point of view—how the war will end. We don't know. Let's take the general speculation that there will be some kind of stalemate or some kind of deal. That deal, whatever it is, will no doubt have to have some measure of security guarantees for Ukraine.
One option is they are brought into NATO. Another option is they receive equivalent security guarantees, not just like the Budapest thing, which is a political guarantee, but a hard-core security guarantee that's legal, and not by NATO but by certain NATO members individually. You would have a group of NATO countries that sign up as individual states to provide security guarantees to Ukraine. It takes away the bogeyman of NATO as a whole, but you have the strength of certain key partners like the United States and so on. That's another option in there.
A complete neutrality and a demilitarized Ukraine, which is the Russian objective, I think is not really a strong card right now for the Russians to play.