I will answer in English, because of the technical nature of the question.
Yes, our recommendation still stands. It was accepted by the government. All benefits and services should be in place before they are medically released.
They are not there yet. Part of the issue, as we talked about earlier, is the fact that in some cases the service attribution is not being done in an efficient manner. We talked about that already. Adjudications, therefore, are slow. There is a tremendous backlog in that regard.
As I said in my opening remarks, there are many people in VAC who want to do the right thing. It's absolutely true. I actually hear it all the time. At the same time, they're stifled, or shackled, by the process issues. There are many of them. I encourage the committee to explore those more than anything.
With respect to your question around whether it should be an outside agency of some sort, I don't believe so. In that regard, in terms of service attribution and making sure that happens quickly, the best people to do it are the people who are treating you and have knowledge of your environment within CAF health services. That aspect, I think, is probably best done by the CAF, as we've already recommended.
In terms of the services and supports for everybody, VAC is well positioned to do that. I wouldn't want to hand it to another insurance agency. I don't think that's the right thing either. VAC is probably best positioned to do that. It just needs better processes to do that.