That's understandable. I just think that the criticisms of reaching 2% spending without clarifying that one of the ways that a previous government increased their percentage was to include new categories, and it wasn't new defence spending.... It was a recategorization of putting that spending that was already being done into the 2% spending.
In terms of those numbers, though, in terms of the increases, would that be something you could table with the committee? I would be curious of that progression going back to 2010.