I would totally agree. Obviously, when we're talking about public hearings, it's one thing, because obviously there are lots of very important national issues of security that have to be constrained from sharing publicly. But for parliamentarians to do your jobs, whether it be in the committee of parliamentarians looking at national security, it's really essential you have a better understanding.
I think that comes back to the earlier question of how we stop making these things political footballs. If we had a better understanding of really what's at risk, what the threats are, why these programs matter, that would go a long way, I think, to helping us not make these issues political footballs.