Maybe I can kick it off quickly.
On the issue of risk, when the government came in and talked about the whole deliverology and the idea of ministers ministering their ministries and thinking a little bit about getting on with defence procurement, I think we were all quite excited about the opportunity. Really, on a risk basis, for those programs that are not risky, either in terms of their complexity, their schedule, the amount of money we're spending, clearly, those should be things that would be delegated, and more levels of bureaucracy would not be added to move those programs forward. What was disappointing to me was that something that was very simple in terms of starting to increase the Minister of National Defence's authorities in this respect, took 10 years to do. It started by our saying in 2010 to have a delegation to the minister, and it took 10 years to provide the minister with basic accountabilities for some of these, based on the low-risk program.
If we want to accelerate things, starting with the risk calculation, I think, is the real place to start. Unfortunately, even when the delegations are there, programs that have been delegated are still being called up to be reviewed at Treasury Board. I think that's a problem.