So it has to be in a policy paper when it's pretty obvious to most of us that we need a submarine replacement. We've had testimony before at this committee that we already have Chinese in the Arctic, and of course there's the Russian threat, our next-closest neighbour.
Two weeks ago, Major-General Paul Prévost told the committee, “That industry needs to recognize that there's a global market for this here. We're working with that industry now.” Would you be able to comment on what's holding up the process for NORAD replacement?