I don't want to comment on a specific active procurement, just because we do have members on both sides of these issues.
Again—and I'm going to sound a little bit like a broken record here—it goes back to the need for an aerospace strategy in Canada, to have had these types of conversations five years ago and to have the government clearly come out with a defined set of priorities, capability and capacity that they want to build here in Canada. That strategy would then inform the path forward. There are pros and cons on both sides of the issue here that we find ourselves in. That need for a long-term strategy is absolutely critical. The government needs to come to the table and start to have these types of conversations so we don't end up in situations where it's uncertain as to what's going on.
If you had that long-term strategy, if you had the key capabilities defined by the government, by the Canadian Armed Forces, you could have these discussions earlier. That, to me, is the core of all the procurement problems and potential different paths forward on some of these things.