I was going to first touch on the indirect versus direct capabilities front. In particular, it's not to demean a capability if it's indirect. It's the point of delineation that we used and implemented in the model. Is it something that is typically deployed as part of a force mix, or is it something that can be conceivably deployed by itself? I think reasonable people can have disagreements on that front.
With regard to the international comparisons, I believe this is an import from both U.K. and U.S. military doctrine, but perhaps Mr. Binyam Solomon could....