Okay.
I found it interesting that the ratio on the Canadian Army, the tooth-to-tail ratio, is worse than it is for navy or air force. To me, it's counterintuitive. I would expect that it would be more expensive for direct military effect to put fighter jets in the air and ships to sea than it would be to put soldiers out in the field.
Why is it that we have so much more overhead costs and indirect costs tied to the Canadian Armed Forces in the army?