Thank you, Mr. Collins.
Before Mr. Bezan moves his motion, the chair has a question.
After the combat ships and maybe the F-35s, the largest single expenditure is going to be on the NORAD modernization, particularly the over-the-horizon radar. That strikes me as tailed or indirect rather than direct because there is no lethality to that capability, yet without that capability, the lethality is rendered useless.
In your direct-indirect analysis, does that go into the indirect pile and not the direct pile? If it does, then will that move the numbers around, if you will, or skew the numbers once again?