Okay.
We had a recommendation from another witness who talked about maybe structuring the procurement process a bit differently from the way we do it today, especially for our larger contracts. We talked about removing some of the barriers and hurdles that vendors need to go through when they're going through that process.
His suggestion was that while that might prove to have some benefit to us in terms of speed—and I think that's of the utmost importance, both for the government and for the vendors who are participating—it may have some impact on transparency in terms of almost bending the rules rather than breaking them, which could create a messy situation, certainly from a political perspective. Our constituents want everything to be open and transparent. We don't want to run into instances of vendors complaining at the end of the day that there has been some bias.
Can I get your reaction as we look at the procurement policies that have been developed over decades, probably for the entire life of your operation at FELLFAB there in Hamilton? What's your opinion in terms of removing some of the requirements that are embedded into the procurement process if the outcome is that we may have less transparency with what we put out from a procurement perspective?