Thank you very much.
Without going back to the substance of the study, because I know we're looking at Mrs. Lalonde's amendment, this study remains particularly interesting. However, I feel that we've already covered a certain part of this issue. I'm thinking in particular of the fact that we've conducted specific studies on the issue of spy balloons, which indirectly touched on the aerospace industry. We've also carried out general studies on threats to Canada, where we looked at the aerospace issue.
I find it a little disappointing that we weren't able to discuss the schedule before we got into the motions. In any case, as long as we're looking at at least two meetings, it would seem to me that reducing the number of meetings and not having at least four is a good idea. Two meetings doesn't seem like a lot to me, but I'd be comfortable with three. At the very least, that's a minimum. We'll be able to adjust in due course. However, I still have the impression that some of the discussions will overlap with some of the work and studies we've already done.