Yes, absolutely.
In the context of national security, I think the German chancellor's perspective is instructive. He recognized that whether you can argue the 2% pledge has lineage and rational economic thought behind it, it's the number that's being used.
In terms of investments in national security capacities, which are significantly military but not just military, I think of Mr. Fadden's testimony a little while ago about what GAC needs, what the Communications Security Establishment needs, what the service needs. It's a much more complicated discussion than just investments in the military.
However, is the military in need of additional resources, and is the new Westminster system in need of a bit of a process shift in terms of the enablement of the spending of resources towards military capability? Yes.