I want to quickly get back to the situation I was talking about regarding Mr. Sewell. You had been talking about the program for covering moving funds, but that program had actually changed. The person I was talking about actually got caught in a time before that change in policy.
Is there any sort of reconsideration that could be attempted for people who have found themselves now out of luck, because they didn't happen to fall within the timelines before the changes were made to make that policy better?