Evidence of meeting #86 for National Defence in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was going.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Bill Matthews  Deputy Minister, Department of National Defence
Caroline Xavier  Chief, Communications Security Establishment, Communications Security Establishment
Frances J. Allen  Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, Canadian Armed Forces, Department of National Defence
Nancy Tremblay  Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Materiel, Department of National Defence

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

But then how are you training? What I'm hearing from our troops at different bases across this country is that a company's strength is supposed to be nearing 200 soldiers, and we're down to 120. Where we're supposed to have seven or eight LAVs, we're only running four or five, because we don't have enough LAVs that are usable at this point in time. We heard during the Liberal decade of darkness that instead of giving our troops bullets, we're training them to go around and go “bang, bang”. Are we going back to that, especially with this billion-dollar cut that the Liberals have done to our Canadian Armed Forces?

5:10 p.m.

LGen Frances J. Allen

Perhaps I'll let Ms. Tremblay speak to the initiatives to try to improve spare parts going forward first, and then I can perhaps speak to any other training elements after that.

5:10 p.m.

Nancy Tremblay Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Materiel, Department of National Defence

What I can say on the sustainment of equipment is that we're working very hard to make sure that we provide the right equipment that is safe and available to the Canadian—

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

I'll stop you there. Before my time runs out, I just want to move the following motion:

That the committee report to the House, based on testimony:

1. the state of munitions production and procurement in Canada is abysmal;

2. the state of readiness of the Canadian Armed Forces is declining; and

3. the Canadian Armed Forces possesses insufficient quantities of certain munitions.

That the committee call on the Government to:

a. reverse the $1‑billion budget cut announced by the Liberal government to the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces;

b. expand munitions production in Canada;

c. increase munition exports to Ukraine; and

d. support the development of weapons and munitions manufacturing capabilities in Ukraine by Canadian industry.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Okay. It's tabled. It's in order. It's a subject matter before the court, and his time is expired.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

I'd like to circulate it in both French and English.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Now we go to Mr. Collins for a final four minutes.

I am assuming, colleagues, that if the bells start ringing, you'll allow Mr. Collins to complete his four minutes. Thank you.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

I have a motion on the floor.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

You've got a motion on the floor, but we're not going to debate it.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

It's my right to debate it. It's in order.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

I'm sorry. You are right. I apologize.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

I did give notice.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

Yes. I apologize.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

Mr. Chair, I do thank our witnesses for appearing and providing testimony today, along with the minister, but just let me say this: We have heard through a number of our studies now that we have serious problems in procurement and that we have serious problems in the production of munitions in this country. I do welcome the announcement by the minister, but whether that would....

If you want in, you have to move a point of order.

5:10 p.m.

Liberal

Marie-France Lalonde Liberal Orléans, ON

I have a point of order.

I'm wondering if we can also share it for those who are online, Mr. Chair. Thank you.

5:10 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

The clerk has a copy of it.

I will keep on explaining behind the conversation here.

We've seen two reports coming from the Department of National Defence, both the performance report from the department and the Roussy report that was done under the MINDS program on our air force. In addition to that, we saw Vice-Admiral Topshee's video on the state of readiness of our maritime fleet.

It is deeply concerning for all of us that our ability to defend Canada, our ability to be a reliable ally under NATO and our ability to take on any extra roles with the concern around the PRC and its aggressive posture that we're seeing in the Strait of Taiwan in the South China Sea, especially along the east Thomas Shoal, and in its interactions with the Philippines and its ongoing aggression towards Japan.... We have to be severely concerned that the state of readiness within the Canadian Armed Forces has been undermined.

We also know that Ukraine is in the fight of its life, that the conflict continues to drag on, that it has now become fairly entrenched on both sides and that the line is not moving much these days. Every day, Ukraine sends forward its soldiers, who are sacrificing themselves for the benefit of NATO and the rest of the world and standing up for freedom and liberty—

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

I'm sorry, Mr Bezan. The bells are ringing. I have to adjourn this meeting.

5:15 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

You mean suspend.

5:15 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal John McKay

No, we'll adjourn.

The meeting is adjourned.