Very quickly, President Carr, you referenced an issue that's always been a pet peeve of mine. It's almost a bureaucratic buddy system when somebody retires. It's almost a Seinfeld episode. Somebody retires and we have a big going-away party for them and their 30 years of service. Then they're back two weeks later, working on a contract basis.
You highlighted that, but you didn't give a recommendation in terms of what we should consider as it relates to putting rules in place that prevent this from occurring. I see it as a morale issue. It prevents people within the organization from applying for the position that was made vacant by people who retire.
Can you provide some assistance, in terms of where we should go with that issue, if we're looking at recommendations to improve the system?