As to the construct of how it would work, the ombudsman is still going to report through the minister. The work that's done through the CAF would have to come through that chain. If there is no response, where does it go from there? The corrections ombudsman right now reports through the minister. He goes to the commissioner. If there's no action, he goes to the minister. If not, it goes from there to the House, it gets tabled and there is light shone on it.
How do we want to do that at the end of the day? Is it through the committee? Is it taken to the House? I think those details on the best way forward need to be determined.
There are several options. The Five Eyes have various applications of this, so I think there are ways of doing it, but I think it would remain about what the capacity is and where it should go. That's how I'd like to see it reviewed.