I would say for the most part they certainly do. I'm following some of the feedback and testimony that have come out of the previous meetings here, understanding that, again, the government rejected an accelerated process for sexual misconduct victims and survivors requesting information.
At the end of the day, I would have wanted to hear in the deputy's response—which I did not hear in his defence of that rejection—information that might come into play in a court setting. If there's a statute of limitations, a limitation period or some court timeline that cannot be amended, are you going to tell a sexual misconduct survivor or victim who has to give a victim impact statement, “I'm sorry. We just process everything and all of the ATIPs we get in order”?
To your specific question, if the committee thinks they're relevant—