I think the basics of the system exist. The system that I would say needs to be fixed is the people system. It's the people version of that system, which is about making sure that when you report to someone, they're willing to take it on.
Here's my interpretation of the obligations of superior officers. If a subordinate came to me to report wrongdoing and after I reported it to my boss I was not satisfied that my boss was going to do the proper thing, I would have an obligation—not an option, not a chance—to take that further.
In my particular case, I'm the most junior member—the person who was victimized in this situation—and I've had to fight every step of the way. I've given you the names of all the commanding officers and superior officers who have knowledge of this. Why is it being driven by those individuals?
In the system, what is severely lacking is, effectively, an internal champion or people who wouldn't be punished for saying, “I respectfully disagree with the boss's opinion; I need to go talk to their boss.” It's seen inherently as insubordination.