With the general consensus between Serge, Roy, you, and so forth, it's no surprise to endorse that positioning for this May and June, of dealing with certain subjects to get a broader overview and dealing with discrete units.
The other thing I'd like to pick up on is on what Serge said when he noted that energy policy was an absolutely crucial and all-encompassing thing. Even though we shouldn't necessarily decide or pick out specifics right now on how to deal with it, I'd like to note that energy policy is very important for forestry, mining, oil and gas, and encompasses everything we do.
So I'd just like to say again, let's concentrate on this broad picture, with maybe the mining, forestry, or whatever other suggestions we've had here, and then begin to think and move the focus to something along the lines of energy policy that we could specifically pick out and that would be useful, targeted, and not so broad that it became useless. We did that in the industry committee where we didn't have a focus for our studies, but it should be discrete enough on an element of energy policy, eventually.
We're maybe looking toward the fall on this, so that we can get something accomplished in a timeline that wouldn't be interfered with by potential elections in that period. So for the first few months, we should continue to look at the consensus that seems to be building, and at an energy policy in which there will be elements that we can agree on and that fit everyone's constituencies across the whole country, because energy is such a broad category.