I think the 75 minutes, in the way it's been described, works, but I think we need to look at it in the practical realities of a meeting that will typically last two hours. The idea that we'd have this full turnout for every meeting and that everyone would want to ask a question is not totally realistic. By the same token, there could be a topic that is very hot and topical and everyone will want to get their dibs in.
I think the chair and the staff need to be guided by this being a two-hour meeting and by how many witnesses we have, so that there's an opportunity for this to happen. Otherwise, 75 minutes of questioning becomes a practical impossibility.
If it's a two-hour meeting and you have four on a panel—