Over the last few months we've been having extensive conversations with people within natural resources, within the environment group, and within other sectors as well. We've been talking about a made-in-Canada climate change plan that could include targets for emission reductions and also the recognition of carbon sinks, of which forests would be one. Within the context of that overall plan and within a trading system that allows you to move reductions from the forest sector against your emissions, that would provide value to the reductions from the forest sector.
If you look at our company, for instance, we're an integrated forest products company. We have pulp and paper mills in our front yard and trees in our back yard. Within an overall climate change program, if we're required to reduce emissions from our pulp and paper operations--which we see as a very realistic assumption--then we'd like to use the reductions from our woodlands against the emissions from our pulp and paper operations. These reductions are every bit as valid and every bit as recognizable and verifiable as the emissions. There's that value; it is very real and tangible.