We asked a number of questions in the House, to try and understand the reasons why the program was being terminated, and I believe we were told that the assessment prior to renovations and the one after completion of the renovations were considered to be of a purely administrative nature. We were also told that because this was an administrative type of program, it was not considered to be a good investment for taxpayers.
I would be interested in hearing your views on that. Do you believe that the pre-assessment and final assessment are purely administrative in nature or are they in fact interventions under the program aimed at measuring its ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?