I can just refer back to what we have said in the past in the Office of the Auditor General. We were not favouring one tool over another. What we are saying is that every tool will be developed as robustly as possible, and if it's the right tool to achieve the objective, that's fine. But we have seen in the past, and we have looked at that, that voluntary agreements were not as robust as they should have been. And the most important thing, in this case in particular--and it's not for me to judge if at the time it was the right tool or not--is to have third-party verification so we will know if this agreement, in particular, is working well or not.
We don't know as we speak. We haven't seen the results, but it's important that Canadians can see what results are achieved through this particular tool.