The Weyburn project was mentioned in this report as the one project that had gotten money from Natural Resources Canada. It was up and running, yet they were reporting these very low numbers for the carbon dioxide reductions that were encompassed by the program. I was just curious whether you could answer. Obviously you can't.
I know there is the dynamic right now between removing carbon and adding hydrogen to the oil sands product. Is there any sense of which is the better of those two for carbon dioxide intensity, or are they a saw-off?