Thank you.
In the meantime, we have the oil sands production more than doubling in the next few years. So I think we all have some challenges to deal with this issue.
One thing our government believes in is that everybody, including citizens, has to get involved in greenhouse gas reduction. Energy efficiency is a good part of that.
I'm not trying to put you on the spot, because I appreciate that these could be political decisions, but we've heard a lot about the 50-cent dollar with the retrofit program--I think it's the EnerGuide for Housing. I'd like to understand it better. For example, there are 50-cent dollars if it's administration or there's an audit component. I mean, if you're going to retrofit your home, there has to be a program validating that these are actually going to achieve energy efficiency and that there are actual expenditures. I think every taxpayer would understand that.
I think the bigger question, and that's what we haven't heard so much about, is whether the EnerGuide program actually produces results in terms of increasing our energy efficiency. Is it good value for the dollar? Whether there's an audit component or not, it's an interesting discussion.
I wonder if you could comment on that. What part of the 50ยข that has been in the public domain was administration and what part was audit? Did the program achieve results in terms of energy efficiency?