Good day, Mr. Minister.
Ms. Nash raised a question earlier with regard to chrysotile, and I would like to know the department's policy on this matter. I know a little bit about this file after having studied it. The department bases its position on the fact that there are various types of asbestos fibres, including chrysotile, and that studies indicate that this fibre may be used safely and in a controlled environment. These studies have been recognized all over the world for over 30 years. Peer reviews were carried out, and there is no comparison with the man-made fibres, whose impact on human health is not fully known.
The Chrysotile Institute is promoting its controlled usage globally, and especially in the buyer countries, namely through International Labour Organization's Convention 162. Personally, I am disappointed that these studies are said to be bought by the industry, when in fact, as I mentioned, there were peer reviews.
Is the Department basing its policy on these factual and scientific considerations?
Then, when it comes to Canada's Clean Air Act, unlike my colleague, I happen to share your enthusiasm. I think that it is a solid plan, and in my opinion, we are headed in the right direction. However, from what I hear, in the field, there are no short-term objectives. This is not how I interpret Canada's Clean Air Act, but it may be the case for part of the public and for some members from the Opposition.
So I would appreciate some more details from you on this issue, Mr. Minister.