You are telling us that to be responsible, you are shovelling the cost over into the government's yard. If it pays you, you will take the money, but you do not want your profits to drop. And what is unbelievable is that you are producing a superior product that you can therefore sell for a better price, but you do not want to cut into this product in order to reduce greenhouse gases. It seems to me that there is something missing here. You no longer are like the investors of yesteryear, who were people who felt a responsibility towards society. If the government does it, then fine, but if you are forced to do it and to incur a slight reduction in your profits, then you refuse. This is unfortunate.
On November 21st, 2006. See this statement in context.