That is crucial in this, because how you scope it determines the nature of the assessment.
Let's say we move to a panel. Then I think another critical point is the terms and conditions, or what is to be studied at the panel, what the panel is to review. It is absolutely critical. If you don't ask the panel, for instance, to look at CO2 emissions or greenhouse gases or climate change, you'll never get a recommendation coming out the other end, basically. So it depends; what you put in determines what comes out the other end from the panel.
Has there ever been a panel that has looked at CO2 emissions or greenhouse gases as part of their review in the oil sands?