As a matter of fact, I ask myself a question. I’m not sure if I understood Mr. Paradis’ explanation in response to Mr. Cullen’s question on short-term financing. Can someone enlighten me as to what the connection is with Mr. Tonks’ motion? If I understand correctly, the government had made commitments, and this motion is asking the government to honour what is outstanding. Is this correct? I’m not sure I fully understand. Could Mr. Paradis explain this to me?
