Now I'll go to sequestration and the importance of that. Once again, we set short-term targets and regulations in the future for the production of carbon dioxide. You've set dollar limits of $20 a barrel. We've heard $100 a tonne here in these committee hearings for the cost of sequestration. How do those compare with many of the other types of technologies that are available now?
We use 1,400 petajoules of energy heating our homes. We use a similar amount in commercial establishments. If you even look at something like solar thermal energy, where you can install at a much lower cost than $100 a displaced tonne of carbon dioxide, where does this all fit in? Why would we jump to support this particular industry, which is well financed and well developed, in its pursuit of reduction of carbon dioxide through its own large efforts rather than...? We're going to set up a whole sectoral approach where there are many opportunities for the Canadian government to invest in particular fields and particular areas to produce the results. Why would you be at the front of the queue rather than the residential, the commercial, the institutional, or the transportation industry?