Both of them have to be done. I think in the short term, it's use of the residual biomass resources, which in some jurisdictions in Canada are brought to the side of the road and burned. This happens a lot in Ontario. So in some jurisdictions there are problems with that. It's an energy resource that's even brought to the edge of the road, but it's not being utilized. Accessing that is a key part of an early-stage bioenergy opportunity in provinces and regions.
Longer term, I think it's really an issue of moving in, especially after major disturbances like the mountain pine beetle, getting in and looking at planting trees that are going perhaps to be able to last longer, that have a better chance of being around forty years from now, and also, instead of using natural regeneration, use planting after harvest and other forest management strategies that are well known to be able to increase the productivity per hectare and speed up the rate at which the trees regrow. That would be a carbon sink relative to a business-as-usual strategy.